Monday, August 9, 2010

Britain’s most senior traffic policeman is at war with the Government over road safety

Crabsallover notes the decision to terminate speed cameras in Oxford and is concerned about the possible reduction of use of speed cameras in Dorset. Do speed cameras save lives? What is the evidence?

Philip Pank Last updated August 9 2010 12:01AM source: The Times

Britain’s most senior traffic policeman is at war with the Government over road safety, claiming that a decision to cut funding for speed cameras will put lives at risk. In letters seen by The Times, Chief Constable Mick Giannasi has warned ministers of a rise in fatal road accidents as councils switch off speed cameras because they can no longer afford to operate them.

Mr Giannasi estimates that four out of five cameras will be obsolete within five years, adding that redundancies in back offices mean that enforcement is already being curtailed.

The Government has cut £38 million from this year’s road safety budget. 

Mr Giannasi, the chief constable of Gwent Police, heads the roads portfolio for the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). He said that the

Government’s decision to cut 40 per cent of the road safety grant paid to local authorities, coupled with a pledge not to fund new fixed cameras, had provoked “unintended consequences for road safety” as councils take cameras out of service. 

“We have invested heavily in infrastructure. There is a danger that it is dwindling away. I think a vacuum has been created and people are reacting to that inappropriately,” he told The Times. “If nothing is put in place, speeds will rise and casualties will grow.” Driving standards will deteriorate, child road safety programmes will be hit and the education of offenders will cease, Mr Giannasi said.

The Treasury would also lose a “significant” revenue stream. Mr Giannasi has written two letters to Mike Penning, the road safety minister, setting out his concerns. In one he writes: “If this unacceptable situation is to be avoided, immediate action is essential . . . I cannot overstate the urgency of this situation and the potential damage that will be the consequence of inaction.”

Mr Giannasi insists there is no rift with the Government but he told The Times: “I think it is appropriate for me to say I am disappointed with the level of leadership.” In his reply, Mr Penning assured the police that “there is an important role for safety camera enforcement”.

In his first day in office, Philip Hammond, the Secretary of State for Transport, proclaimed “the end of the war on motorists” and promised to make good on a manifesto pledge to pull the plug on funds for new cameras. Oxfordshire became the first council to turn off its speed cameras last week, but a slew of other counties are contemplating similar moves. Northamptonshire has taken some cameras out of operation, Somerset plans to do the same, while at least three others — Buckinghamshire, Derbyshire and Wiltshire — have plans to pare back their networks. Devon and Cornwall are considering an end to speed cameras while Dorset and Norfolk are among regions to have put their cameras under review.

Road safety campaigners and motoring organisations insist that speed cameras slow traffic and save lives. 

The first speed cameras were trialled in Britain in 1992. A law passed in 1999 allowed local authorities to use the devices. Road deaths fell to a record low of 2,222 last year.

The cameras’ demise would signal “the return to the racetrack” for some drivers, according to one expert. Richard Allsop, professor of transport studies at University College London and a trustee of the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS), said: “The concerns are real, PACTS shares these concerns, and we support ACPO in drawing the new minister’s attention to the unintended consequences that could be severe if urgent thought is not given to avoiding them.” Professor Allsop said it would be “extremely serious” if the Government had not drafted a new road safety strategy by Christmas.

“If you let up, it will go into reverse,” Professor Allsop said, citing the Netherlands, which relaxed road safety programmes in the early 1990s, only to suffer a rise in road deaths. 

Since the development of the first fixed Gatso (brand of speed camera) speed cameras in the Netherlands, they have been installed across continental Europe. Their proliferation over the past decade reflects a consensus that the cameras are effective at slowing traffic and reducing road deaths. There is no sign yet of other countries following Britain’s lead in cutting back on the devices. On the contrary, some campaigners are pressing for a change in international law to allow drivers caught speeding abroad to face prosecution in their home countries. At present, automated speed camera fines cannot follow you home.

More than 6,000 speed cameras in Britain raise about £100 million each year. Money collected through £60 speeding fines goes to the Treasury, which in turn provides grants to local authorities. The Department for Transport leaves councils to set their own spending priorities.


Chief Constable Mick Giannasi is roads officer for the police chiefs
Huw Evans Agency




Sunday, August 8, 2010

Getting speed limits reduced in villages

DorsetRoadSafe http://www.dorsetroadsafe.org/index.php?ref=36 say 'if you would like a speed limit to be lowered your request will be assessed based on the nationally agreed criteria:-http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/speedmanagement/dftcircular106/dftcircular106.pdf. This paper gives a reference to Taylor (2000) mentioned (page 6) in point 17) 
Research has in particular proven the correlation between speed and accident frequency and severity, and accident reductions. Much of this evidence has been demonstrated by and around mean vehicle speeds including, for example, how each 1 mph reduction in average speed reduces accident frequency by 5% (Finch et al., 1993; Taylor et al., 2000).


Figure A (from Taylor, M. C., Lynam, D. A. and Baruya, A. (2000), TRL Report 421 – The Effects of Drivers’ Speed on the Frequency of Road Accidents. Crowthorne: TRL) concludes (pg 2) that:-

  • in any given situation, higher speeds mean more accidents and the higher the speed the more rapidly does accident frequency rise with increases in speed. 
  • Reducing the speed of the fastest drivers (ie. those travelling faster than the average for the road) would yield the greatest benefits in reducing death and injury. 
  • The percentage reduction in accident frequency achievable per 1mile/h reduction in average speed is between 2-7%. The earlier 5% figure remains a robust general rule. The reduction achievable, however, varies according to the road type and the average traffic speed. Specifically:-
    • about 6% for urban roads with low average speeds; 
    • about 4% for medium speed urban roads and lower speed rural main roads
    • about 3% for the higher speed urban roads and rural main roads. 
    • In urban areas the potential for accident reduction (per 1mile/h reduction in average speed) is greatest on those roads with low average speeds (Figure A). These are typically busy main roads in towns with high levels of pedestrian activity, wide variations in speeds, and high accident frequencies.

from page 19, point 74 Traffic Advisory Leaflet 09/99 (20 mph Speed Limits and Zones) (DETR 1999a) gives advice on how and where to implement 20 mph speed limits and 20 mph zones.

from page 20, point 78. 20 mph zones are very effective at reducing collisions and injuries. This is confirmed in research that shows that the number of accidents involving injury to children may be reduced by up to two-thirds (Webster and Mackie, 1996).

Dorset RoadSafe 'No Excuses' Campaign

Dorset RoadSafe commenced their 'No excuse' campaign in January 2010 in an effort to reduce accidents in Dorset. The website says:-

"Dorset Road Safe is a partnership of local councils, emergency services and other organisations working together to reduce the number of people killed and seriously injured on Dorset’s roads.

Throughout 2010, the partnership is delivering the ‘no excuse’ project, which aims to cut the number of deaths and serious injuries on our roads by cracking down on the types of bad and careless driving and riding that cause crashes.

These include inappropriate speed, drink and drug driving, not wearing a seatbelt and distractions like using a mobile phone while driving.

'No excuse' is using a combination of additional enforcement on the roads with awareness-raising, publicity and education activities in a big effort to drive casualties down."

Follow this link to download the 'no excuse' fact sheet (276kb PDF) >


In Dorset the Killed, Serious injured and injured figures for 2008 and 2009 are given in a table.



Casualties are categorised by severity:

Fatal – injuries resulting in death within 30 days of collision occurring

Serious – over night detention in hospital (examples include paralysis, fractures, major lacerations)

Slight – examples include whiplash, sprains or minor lacerations

Based on DfT figures, the costs to the community for each severity of crash are as follows:

Fatal - £1.6million
Serious - £190,000
Slight – £19,000

Our targets for casualty reductions are set by the Department for Transport (DfT). In the government’s current road safety strategy, “Tomorrow’s Roads – Safer for Everyone”, three national casualty reduction targets are to be achieved by 2010 based on the 1994-1998 average. They are:





  1. A 40% reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured (KSI) 
  2. A 50% reduction in the number of children killed or seriously injured. 
  3. A 10% reduction in the number of people slightly injured. 
The validated 2009 KSI figure for the whole of Dorset although being an improvement on the KSI figure for 2008 with a reduction of 14%, from 437 in 2008 to 376 2009, is still behind the 2010 target and is likely to place Dorset within the lower quartile of performance across Great Britain.

In order to achieve the 2010 target set by the DfT KSI casualties need to fall by 24% in 2010 based against the figure for 2009.

All casualties by month and local authority area

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight casualties by month split into local authority areas with a comparison of 2009 against 2008.



buckle up!
In Dorset in the first six months of the 'No Excuses' campaign more than 10,000 offences have been committed - speeding, not wearing seatbelts and using mobile phones are the most commonly detected offences. 
  • majority for speeding
  • 21% for not buckling up. 
  • More than 680 (7%) people were caught using their mobile phones while driving.
The 'best' excuse I've heard for not wearing a seatbelt....
A woman stopped for not wearing a seatbelt: "I just had a spray on tan applied and don't want to smudge it"
Latest events from Dorset RoadSafe.

Speed Limiters

My new Nissan Qashqai Acenta has a brilliant Active Speed Limitation Function (ASLF) aka Speed Limiation Assistance (SLA) which I've used at every speed for a month now. For example on a 30mph road you set the speed limiter to 30mph and it will stop you going above 30mph unless you floor the accelerator pedal. Going from 30mph onto a 40mph speed limit road a single click sets the speed limiter to 40mph. It has transformed the way I and Sharon drive! Less chance to get speeding tickets or cause an accident by driving too fast!!

ASLF are defined (para. 4.2) by Euro NCAP as Adjustable Speed Limitation Function. ASLF means a function which allows the driver to set a vehicle speed Vadj, to which he wishes the speed of his car to be limited or above which he wishes to be warned. Vadj – Adjustable limit speed Vadj means the speed voluntarily set by the driver. Active ASLF means an ASLF which, when activated, requires the driver to make a positive action in order to exceed Vadj.

Euro NCAP says "In 2009, French carmakers made tackling speeding drivers their priority. Citroen, Peugeot and Renault as well as new premium brand in Europe Infiniti were rewarded by Euro NCAP for their fitment of a driver controlled speed limitation device. In cars: Citroen C3, Peugeot 3008, 308 CC, 5008, the Renault Grand Scenic and Infiniti FX. Speed limits are intended to keep traffic speeds below the maximum that is appropriate, ensuring the safety of motorists and other road users."


The only other supermini / small family car / small MPV I've found that has a speed limiter fitted as standard is the Renault Clio Dynamique 1.6.

The Mazda 2 Sport has a speed alarm fitted. I've test driven this car and the alarm can only be set for one speed limit eg 30mph. I think I'd tend to ignor the alarm more often than not!


Euro NCAP also quote Research (pg 3) carried out by the Transport Research Laboratory that has shown that at 25% above the average speed, a driver is six times more likely to have an accident than a driver travelling at the average speed.

From 2009 Euro NCAP have given max. 1 point or 14% (out of 7 points) for Speed Limitation Devices in the Safety Assist section. Details section 4 - Euro NCAP February 2010 v 5.2 Safety Assist.
It seems that the extra 0.1 for "can system be set at speed" is essential - so 0.9 points is minimum I'd personally accept (my Nissan Qashqai would possibly score 1.0 points if tested by Euro NCAP)

Friday, August 6, 2010

I will be a better driver

Sharon gave me a nice birthday present today, an Institute of Advanced Motorists 'Skill for Life for drivers' - everything you need to pass your Advanced Driving Test and become a full Member of the IAM.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Euro NCAP Advanced will reward manufacturers at Paris Motor Show

13th July 2010: At eSafety Challenge at Millbrook Euro NCAP announced Euro NCAP Advanced, a reward system for new and emerging safety technologies.


Recent technological advancements have considerably broadened the automotive safety landscape. Features like Lane Departure Warning, Blind Spot Monitoring, Attention Assist, Autonomous Braking and Emergency Call are increasingly offered as options by car makers on their newest models. However, with so many technologies entering the market, and with no independent advice on the safety benefit they offer, many consumers are left feeling confused.

Euro NCAP Advanced aims to provide car buyers with clear guidance about the safety benefits which these new technologies offer them and their families. The new reward system, complementing Euro NCAP’s existing star rating scheme, will recognize and reward manufacturers who promote those new safety technologies which have a scientifically proven safety benefit. By rewarding technologies which may currently be fitted only on luxury models or as options, Euro NCAP will provide an incentive to manufacturers to accelerate the standard fitment of important safety equipment across their entire model ranges, bringing safety benefits to all.

Many of the technologies are so new that no accepted standards exist to assess them. Euro NCAP has developed a unique methodology which allows the potential safety benefits of any new technology to be determined. Unlike Euro NCAP’s well established assessments involving physical tests at a crash laboratory, the new process is based entirely on the assessment of scientific evidence presented by the vehicle manufacturer. An independent panel of experts looks at the extent of the safety problem which a new technology aims to address. Through a logical and rigorous analysis of the way in which the technology has been developed, tested and validated, and from any real-world experience that may exist, the system’s performance and its expected effectiveness can be determined. Recognition of the potential benefit of these new technologies in no way undermines the importance of basic crash safety: cars are eligible for a Euro NCAP Advanced reward only if they have already achieved a creditable three star rating in the overall rating scheme.

At the eSafety Challenge in Millbrook, Dr Michiel van Ratingen, Secretary General of Euro NCAP said “With these rewards Euro NCAP will add a new dimension to its mission. From now on consumers will be able to learn more about the benefits of advanced safety systems in their car and consult Euro NCAP for advice before deciding on purchase. Collectively we can make another step forward in effectively reducing traffic fatalities and injuries on European roads.”

At the upcoming Paris Motor Show in October 2010, the association will reward the first set of manufacturers for their efforts in their development of new advanced safety features. Information about the rewarded technologies will be posted on the car’s webpage of Euro NCAP’s website.

SEiSS 2004 - Key Diagrams

Final Report |




Sunday, July 25, 2010

eSafety Realism


Report: pdf

Active Safety Systems by Brian Knibb, KGP (Derby, UK)

Source: 22nd IRM WG meeting, 15 June 2009 - Report & Acronyms used.





In the KPG analysis high benefit & low cost Active eSafety systems are 

  • Traction Systems
    • TPMS (Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems)
    • ABS (Anti-braking System)
    • ESC (Electronic Stability Control)
    • EBA (Emergency Brake Assist)
  • Lighting Systems
    • CAL (Curve Adaptive Lighting)
  • Tracking Systems
    • RTTS (Real Time Tracking Systems) - a GPS system that alerts if the car is exceeding the speed limit