Tuesday, July 27, 2010

SEiSS 2004 - Key Diagrams

Final Report |




Sunday, July 25, 2010

eSafety Realism


Report: pdf

Active Safety Systems by Brian Knibb, KGP (Derby, UK)

Source: 22nd IRM WG meeting, 15 June 2009 - Report & Acronyms used.





In the KPG analysis high benefit & low cost Active eSafety systems are 

  • Traction Systems
    • TPMS (Tyre Pressure Monitoring Systems)
    • ABS (Anti-braking System)
    • ESC (Electronic Stability Control)
    • EBA (Emergency Brake Assist)
  • Lighting Systems
    • CAL (Curve Adaptive Lighting)
  • Tracking Systems
    • RTTS (Real Time Tracking Systems) - a GPS system that alerts if the car is exceeding the speed limit


Car Safety Acronyms

source: Implementation Road Map Working Group.

eSafety Challenge 2009 - Women are key to adoption of Active eSafety

Summary Report and Full Report.

In the mini class 83% are sold WITHOUT Electronic Stability Control

New research presented at the Challenge, held in Milbrook, UK, on 13 July 2010 shows that despite rising awareness of life saving crash avoidance technologies not enough cars have crucial eSafety systems fitted. Thousands of lives could be saved if these systems were more widely used.

Across the five biggest European markets, installation rates for eSafety systems such as anti-skid device Electronic Stability Control (ESC) are still too low. In particular very few small cars have ESC installed as standard. In the mini class, the majority (83%) are sold without ESC, new figures show.

New Mercedes ESF 2009 Experimental Safety Vehicle


Mercedes Benz S-Class, Pre-Safe Braking.

Monday, July 19, 2010

eIMPACT research - Lives and Injuries saved by Car Active eSafety systems



eIMPACT Partners
http://www.eimpact.eu/download/PresentationFinalConference_Introduction.pdf




The eIMPACT project carried out impact assessments of twelve stand-alone and cooperative systems at the EU level, for 2010 and 2020. For each of these two future years, a scenario with a low penetration rate, reflecting no incentives to accelerate deployment, and a high penetration rate, including policy incentives for system deployment, was analysed. Outputs include safety impacts in terms of reductions in fatalities, injuries and accidents, traffic effects in terms of direct (traffic flow) and indirect (reduction in congestion) effects, and the cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for the twelve systems. The CBA was extended by a stakeholder analysis, examining the costs and benefits incurred by users, industry and public authorities. Finally, policy options and strategies were explored for deployment strategies of IVSS.

The following twelve systems met the criteria above (in brackets: the 3-letter abbreviation used in tables and figures throughout this report):
1. Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
2. Full Speed Range ACC (FSR)
3. Emergency Braking (EBR)
4. Pre-Crash Protection of Vulnerable Road Users (PCV)
5. Lane Change Assistant (Warning) (LCA)
6. Lane Keeping Support (LKS)
7. NightVisionWarn (NIW)
8. Driver Drowsiness Monitoring and Warning (DDM)
9. eCall (one-way communication) (ECA)
10. Intersection Safety (INS)
11. Wireless Local Danger Warning (WLD)
12. SpeedAlert (SPE)

By 2020 with high penetration scenarios or if ALL cars were fitted (in brackets), Electronic Stability Control (ESC) will reduce fatal accidents by 14% (16%), SpeedAlert (SPE) by 5% (8%), eCall (ECA) by 4% (6%) and Lane Keeping Support (LKS) by 3% (15%). 

Other IVSS are not likely to have high market penetration rate but IF installed (a very big IF!) on all cars would significantly reduce fatalities: Pre-Crash Protection of Vulnerable Road Users (PCV), Lane Change Assistant Warning (LCA), Night Vision Warning (NIW), Driver Drowsiness Monitoring & Warning (DDM), Intersection Safety (INS), Wireless Local Danger Warning (WLD), Full Speed Range Adaptive Cruise Control (FSR).

As a benchmark, each percentage reduction in fatalities represents 230 fatalities & each percentage reduction in injuries represents European 3500 injuries. For example, in the case of ESC in the 2020 high scenario, 3,220 fatalities (14 * 230) in Europe would be avoided at the high penetration rate of 75% (Figure 2).

If ALL these Car Active eSafety Systems (CAeSS)were adopted by 2020 in ALL cars fatal accidents would be reduced by 80% (from 40,000 in Europe pa to 8,000). If ALL CAeSSachieved predicted high penetration rates fatal accidents would be reduced by 7600 but If these systems had low penetration rates fatal accidents would be reduced by 5700. (Table 1).

The impact assessment provides estimates of effects at realistic penetration rates of the IVSS in 2010 and 2020. For each year, two scenarios were considered: a low scenario, for a ‘business as usual’ situation, and a high scenario, where focused policy incentives are assumed.
27 technologies (Figure 8 & 9) were filtered down to just 12 (Table 4) viz Safe Speed & Safe Distance, Cooperative Tunnel Safety, Frontal Collision Warning, Driver alcohol measurement, Roll Over Avoidance, Safe Urban Intersection, Local Risk Information, Pedestrian & Cyclist Protection, Vehicle Dynamic Management (VDM), Adaptive Head Lights etc) - were NOT included in the final 12 selected.


http://www.eimpact.eu/download/PosterBCA.pdf



http://www.eimpact.eu/download/PresentationFinalConference_Safety_impacts.pdf
http://www.eimpact.eu/download/PresentationFinalConference_Safety_impacts.pdf
http://www.eimpact.eu/download/PresentationFinalConference_Policy_options.pdf